LANDex - Global Land Governance Index

Secure Tenure Rights

1A Legal and institutional framework in place at national level for securing tenure rights, for different types of tenure and by sex

People-Based Assessment

Indicator 1A can be considered an umbrella indicator, as it measures the national legal framework that allows tenure rights to be secured, for men and women, and for diverse kinds of tenure.

Because 1A is an umbrella indicator, if all the Blocks are filled, it will also derive scores for LANDex indicators 3A (Block 3), 4A (Block 2) and 5A (Block 4). If you fulfill those blocks here, there is no need to fill them out again, as scores will be transferred automatically.

Important note: if you are only filling out one of the following – Block 2 (women's land rights), Block 3 (community land rights) or Block 4 (indigenous land rights) – please go directly to those indicators, as indicated above.

Answers you enter into this form will be saved in your browser, to help if you need to pause while completing the form.

Your answers will only be saved into your current browser and on your current device. If you're using Safari, data will be deleted after 7 days.

Basic Information

What country does this data pertain to?*

What email address can you be contacted at?*

What is your name?

Would you like your name to be kept anonymous?

Who are you completing this form for?*

Myself

Someone else

What organisation are you affiliated with?

Is this organisation a people's organisation?*

Yes

What is a people's organisation?

People's organisations are defined as organisations that directly represent people depending upon land and are accountable to them. The constituency the organization represents are indigenous peoples, youth, women, pastoralists, rural workers, rural community members, fishers, landless, forest dwellers and users, peasants and hunter gatherers , afro descendants, quilombolas, adivasi and dalit. NGOs that work closely with people depending upon land but do not represent them are not People's Organisations.

Where is the organisation located?

What sector does your organisation work in?

Respondents should choose the sector that best reflects their affiliation. If no sector presented accurately describes the respondent's affiliation, the Other option should be selected.

While non-governmental organizations (NGOs) can be considered within the broader sector of civil society organizations (CSOs), we provide both options to reflect different understandings of these terms in diverse contexts. The UNDP defines CSOs as "voluntary organizations with governance and direction coming from citizens or constituency members, without significant government-controlled participation or representation," and NGOs "as a subset of CSOs involved in development cooperation." Organizations that have chosen to identify as NGOs in LANDex include the Mongolian Land Management Association (MLMA), the Association of Senegalese Lawyers (AJS) and the Peruvian Center for Social Studies (CEPES). Organizations that have identified as CSOs in LANDex include the Kyrgyz Association of Forest and Land Users, the Citizen Observatory in Chile and the Center for Environment and Development (CED) in Cameroon.

What is your gender?

What is your age?

Block 1: Private Rights to Land

Methodology for this Block comes from the Global Land Rights Index (GLRI), more information and explanations of definitions used are available in this report.

Please Read:

For this block, you will be asked to respond Yes (Y) or No (N) to the following questions.

Please choose the response that best represents the situation in your country.

Under each response, you will be provided with a space to add references and detail to justify your response.

Q1. In your country, is there a constitutionally recognized, private right to own land?

Yes

Reference:

Q2. Is there a private right to exclude others?

Yes

Reference:

Q3. Is there a private right to enjoy the property for any legal means?

Yes

Reference:

Q4. Is there a private right to transfer or lease land?

Yes

Reference:

Q5. Is there a private right to sell land?

Yes

Reference:

Q6. Is there a private right to general inheritance, or right to inherit land specifically?

Yes

Reference:

Block 2: Women's Land Rights

Methodology for this block comes from the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) Legislative Assessment Tool (LAT). More information on this tool is available here.

This block derives the score for LANDex indicator 4A. If you wish to respond only to this block, please go directly to indicator 4A from this page.

Related SDG target: 5.a

Corresponding indicator: 5.a.2

Please read:

For this block, you will be asked to respond to questions in two different ways: some questions will be answered Yes (Y), No (N) or in cases that they don't apply as Not Applicable (N/A). Other questions will be answered on a scale of 0-3, according to descriptions available next to the possible responses.

Please choose the response that best represents the situation in your country.

Under each response, you will be provided with a space to add references and detail to justify your response.

Q1. The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) is ratified

Yes

N/A

Reference:

Q2a. The African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights (ACHPR) is ratified

Yes

N/A

Reference:

Q2b. The Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa (Maputo Protocol)

Yes

N/A

Reference:

Q3: The European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) is ratified

Yes

N/A

Reference:

Q4: The American Convention on Human Rights (Pact of San José) is ratified

Yes

N/A

Reference:

Q5: The Constitution prohibits gender-based discrimination

Yes

N/A

Reference:

Q6: The Constitution recognizes customary law yet gives supremacy to provisions concerning gender equality and non-discrimination in case of conflict

Yes

N/A

Reference:

Q7: The Constitution recognises religious law but states that gender-based discrimination in religious law is superseded by the principle of non-discrimination in the Constitution.

Yes

N/A

Reference:

Q8: The Constitution promotes the adoption of special measures for the advancement of women.

Yes

N/A

Reference:

Q9: Financial resources are allocated to increase women’s ownership and control over land

0: Absence of the indicator in the legal and policy framework

0.5: A draft national policy document provides for the adoption of the indicator

1: A policy is in place, incorporating the indicator

1.5: Draft legislation (bill or otherwise) contains the indicator

2: Primary legislation reflects the indicator

3: Secondary legislation contains the indicator

N/A

Reference:

Q10: Quotas are established for women’s participation in land management and administration institutions

0: Absence of the indicator in the legal and policy framework

0.5: A draft national policy document provides for the adoption of the indicator

1: A policy is in place, incorporating the indicator

1.5: Draft legislation (bill or otherwise) contains the indicator

2: Primary legislation reflects the indicator

3: Secondary legislation contains the indicator

N/A

Reference:

Q11: Men and women have the ability to conclude contracts under the same basic conditions, rights and obligations

0: Absence of the indicator in the legal and policy framework

0.5: A draft national policy document provides for the adoption of the indicator

1: A policy is in place, incorporating the indicator

1.5: Draft legislation (bill or otherwise) contains the indicator

2: Primary legislation reflects the indicator

3: Secondary legislation contains the indicator

Reference:

Q12: Men and women are able to apply for identity documents under the same conditions

0: Absence of the indicator in the legal and policy framework

0.5: A draft national policy document provides for the adoption of the indicator

1: A policy is in place, incorporating the indicator

1.5: Draft legislation (bill or otherwise) contains the indicator

2: Primary legislation reflects the indicator

3: Secondary legislation contains the indicator

N/A

Reference:

Q13: A female national can confer citizenship to her non-national spouse under the same conditions as a male national

0: Absence of the indicator in the legal and policy framework

0.5: A draft national policy document provides for the adoption of the indicator

1: A policy is in place, incorporating the indicator

1.5: Draft legislation (bill or otherwise) contains the indicator

2: Primary legislation reflects the indicator

3: Secondary legislation contains the indicator

N/A

Reference:

Q14: Women can confer citizenship to their children under the same conditions as men

0: Absence of the indicator in the legal and policy framework

0.5: A draft national policy document provides for the adoption of the indicator

1: A policy is in place, incorporating the indicator

1.5: Draft legislation (bill or otherwise) contains the indicator

2: Primary legislation reflects the indicator

3: Secondary legislation contains the indicator

N/A

Reference:

Q15: Gender equality in the right to own or control property within marriage is recognized

0: Absence of the indicator in the legal and policy framework

0.5: A draft national policy document provides for the adoption of the indicator

1: A policy is in place, incorporating the indicator

1.5: Draft legislation (bill or otherwise) contains the indicator

2: Primary legislation reflects the indicator

3: Secondary legislation contains the indicator

Reference:

Q16: The law recognizes full or partial community of property as the default marital property regime

0: Absence of the indicator in the legal and policy framework

0.5: A draft national policy document provides for the adoption of the indicator

1: A policy is in place, incorporating the indicator

1.5: Draft legislation (bill or otherwise) contains the indicator

2: Primary legislation reflects the indicator

3: Secondary legislation contains the indicator

N/A: The indicator does not apply to the country

Reference:

Q17a: Spousal consent is required for land transactions

0: Absence of the indicator in the legal and policy framework

0.5: A draft national policy document provides for the adoption of the indicator

1: A policy is in place, incorporating the indicator

1.5: Draft legislation (bill or otherwise) contains the indicator

2: Primary legislation reflects the indicator

3: Secondary legislation contains the indicator

N/A

Reference:

Q17b: Partner consent is required for land transactions

0: Absence of the indicator in the legal and policy framework

0.5: A draft national policy document provides for the adoption of the indicator

1: A policy is in place, incorporating the indicator

1.5: Draft legislation (bill or otherwise) contains the indicator

2: Primary legislation reflects the indicator

3: Secondary legislation contains the indicator

N/A

Reference:

Q18a: Joint registration of land is compulsory or encouraged through economic incentives for married couples

0: Absence of the indicator in the legal and policy framework

0.5: A draft national policy document provides for the adoption of the indicator

1: A policy is in place, incorporating the indicator

1.5: Draft legislation (bill or otherwise) contains the indicator

2: Primary legislation reflects the indicator

3: Secondary legislation contains the indicator

N/A

Reference:

Q18b: Joint registration of land is compulsory or encouraged through economic incentives for unmarried couples

0.5: A draft national policy document provides for the adoption of the indicator

0: Absence of the indicator in the legal and policy framework

1: A policy is in place, incorporating the indicator

1.5: Draft legislation (bill or otherwise) contains the indicator

2: Primary legislation reflects the indicator

3: Secondary legislation contains the indicator

N/A

Reference:

Q19: Specific reference is made to the protection of women’s land rights within the context of legislation recognizing customary land tenure

0: Absence of the indicator in the legal and policy framework

0.5: A draft national policy document provides for the adoption of the indicator

1: A policy is in place, incorporating the indicator

1.5: Draft legislation (bill or otherwise) contains the indicator

2: Primary legislation reflects the indicator

3: Secondary legislation contains the indicator

N/A: The indicator does not apply to the country

Reference:

Q20a: Equal right of male and female surviving spouses to inherit a share of the deceased’s estate

0: Absence of the indicator in the legal and policy framework

0.5: A draft national policy document provides for the adoption of the indicator

1: A policy is in place, incorporating the indicator

1.5: Draft legislation (bill or otherwise) contains the indicator

2: Primary legislation reflects the indicator

3: Secondary legislation contains the indicator

N/A

Reference:

Q20b: Equal right of male and female surviving partner to inherit a share of the deceased’s estate

0: Absence of the indicator in the legal and policy framework

0.5: A draft national policy document provides for the adoption of the indicator

1: A policy is in place, incorporating the indicator

1.5: Draft legislation (bill or otherwise) contains the indicator

2: Primary legislation reflects the indicator

3: Secondary legislation contains the indicator

N/A

Reference

Q21a: Equal right of male and female surviving spouses to a lifetime use of the family home

0: Absence of the indicator in the legal and policy framework

0.5: A draft national policy document provides for the adoption of the indicator

1: A policy is in place, incorporating the indicator

1.5: Draft legislation (bill or otherwise) contains the indicator

2: Primary legislation reflects the indicator

3: Secondary legislation contains the indicator

N/A

Reference:

Q21b: Equal right of male and female surviving partner to a lifetime use of the family home

0: Absence of the indicator in the legal and policy framework

0.5: A draft national policy document provides for the adoption of the indicator

1: A policy is in place, incorporating the indicator

1.5: Draft legislation (bill or otherwise) contains the indicator

2: Primary legislation reflects the indicator

3: Secondary legislation contains the indicator

N/A

Reference:

Q22a: Equal right to inherit for sons and daughters

0: Absence of the indicator in the legal and policy framework

0.5: A draft national policy document provides for the adoption of the indicator

1: A policy is in place, incorporating the indicator

1.5: Draft legislation (bill or otherwise) contains the indicator

2: Primary legislation reflects the indicator

3: Secondary legislation contains the indicator

N/A

Reference:

Q22b: A right of sons and daughters to inherit equal shares

0: Absence of the indicator in the legal and policy framework

0.5: A draft national policy document provides for the adoption of the indicator

1: A policy is in place, incorporating the indicator

1.5: Draft legislation (bill or otherwise) contains the indicator

2: Primary legislation reflects the indicator

3: Secondary legislation contains the indicator

N/A

Reference:

Q23: Equality before the courts is guaranteed

0: Absence of the indicator in the legal and policy framework

0.5: A draft national policy document provides for the adoption of the indicator

1: A policy is in place, incorporating the indicator

1.5: Draft legislation (bill or otherwise) contains the indicator

2: Primary legislation reflects the indicator

3: Secondary legislation contains the indicator

N/A

Reference:

Q24: Access to the judicial system and other recognised dispute resolution bodies to resolve disputes over tenure rights is guaranteed

0: Absence of the indicator in the legal and policy framework

0.5: A draft national policy document provides for the adoption of the indicator

1: A policy is in place, incorporating the indicator

1.5: Draft legislation (bill or otherwise) contains the indicator

2: Primary legislation reflects the indicator

3: Secondary legislation contains the indicator

N/A

Reference:

Q25: Legal support for land tenure disputes is provided

0: Absence of the indicator in the legal and policy framework

0.5: A draft national policy document provides for the adoption of the indicator

1: A policy is in place, incorporating the indicator

1.5: Draft legislation (bill or otherwise) contains the indicator

2: Primary legislation reflects the indicator

3: Secondary legislation contains the indicator

N/A

Reference:

Q26: A national human rights or gender-specific institution is established

0: Absence of the indicator in the legal and policy framework

0.5: A draft national policy document provides for the adoption of the indicator

1: A policy is in place, incorporating the indicator

1.5: Draft legislation (bill or otherwise) contains the indicator

2: Primary legislation reflects the indicator

3: Secondary legislation contains the indicator

Reference:

Block 3: Community Land Rights

Methodology for this block comes from the Land Mark Legal Security Indicators. More information on Land Mark and these indicators can be found here.

This block derives the score for LANDex indicator 3A. If you wish to respond only to this block, please go directly to indicator 3A from this page.

Please Read:

For this block, you will be asked to respond to questions on a scale of 4-1, where 1 is the highest score possible. This is different from previous blocks, where scoring was from 0-3 with 3 being the highest possible score. We do this in order to facilitate data compatibility, co-generation and sharing of data with Land Mark, according to their methodology.

Please choose the response that best represents the situation in your country.

Under each response, you will be provided with a space to add references and detail to justify your response.

Q1: Does the law recognize all rights that communities exercise over their lands as lawful forms of ownership?

4: No, the law does not address the issue. There are no attempts in the law to meet the issue addressed in the indicator.

3: Partial, the law makes only limited progress towards addressing the issue. The legal framework addresses the indicator, but insignificantly.

2: Partial, the law makes significant progress towards addressing the issue. The legal framework makes significant progress towards, but does not entirely meet the issue addressed in the indicator.

1: Yes, the law addresses the issue fully. The legal framework clearly or expressly meets the issue addressed in the indicator.

N/A: The indicator is not applicable. Not applicable is used in cases where the subject matter in question is non-existent.

Reference

Q2: Although private and customary, and indigenous are different forms of land ownership, does the law give them equal levels of protection?

4: No, the law does not address the issue. There are no attempts in the law to meet the issue addressed in the indicator.

3: Partial, the law makes only limited progress towards addressing the issue. The legal framework addresses the indicator, but insignificantly.

2: Partial, the law makes significant progress towards addressing the issue. The legal framework makes significant progress towards, but does not entirely meet the issue addressed in the indicator.

1: Yes, the law addresses the issue fully. The legal framework clearly or expressly meets the issue addressed in the indicator.

N/A: The indicator is not applicable. Not applicable is used in cases where the subject matter in question is non-existent.

Reference

Q3: Does the law lay out simple and cheap procedures for community lands to be mapped and registered if they wish?

4: No, the law does not address the issue. There are no attempts in the law to meet the issue addressed in the indicator.

3: Partial, the law makes only limited progress towards addressing the issue. The legal framework addresses the indicator, but insignificantly.

2: Partial, the law makes significant progress towards addressing the issue. The legal framework makes significant progress towards, but does not entirely meet the issue addressed in the indicator.

1: Yes, the law addresses the issue fully. The legal framework clearly or expressly meets the issue addressed in the indicator.

N/A: The indicator is not applicable. Not applicable is used in cases where the subject matter in question is non-existent.

Reference

Q4: Does the law enable a community to be a registered owner without it forming a legal entity in which to vest title?

4: No, the law does not address the issue. There are no attempts in the law to meet the issue addressed in the indicator.

3: Partial, the law makes only limited progress towards addressing the issue. The legal framework addresses the indicator, but insignificantly.

2: Partial, the law makes significant progress towards addressing the issue. The legal framework makes significant progress towards, but does not entirely meet the issue addressed in the indicator.

1: Yes, the law addresses the issue fully. The legal framework clearly or expressly meets the issue addressed in the indicator.

N/A: The indicator is not applicable. Not applicable is used in cases where the subject matter in question is non-existent.

Reference

Q5: Does the law recognize communities as the legal administrator of community land?

4: No, the law does not address the issue. There are no attempts in the law to meet the issue addressed in the indicator.

3: Partial, the law makes only limited progress towards addressing the issue. The legal framework addresses the indicator, but insignificantly.

2: Partial, the law makes significant progress towards addressing the issue. The legal framework makes significant progress towards, but does not entirely meet the issue addressed in the indicator.

1: Yes, the law addresses the issue fully. The legal framework clearly or expressly meets the issue addressed in the indicator.

N/A: The indicator is not applicable. Not applicable is used in cases where the subject matter in question is non-existent.

Reference

Q6: Does the law recognize customary lands as held in perpetuity?

4: No, the law does not address the issue. There are no attempts in the law to meet the issue addressed in the indicator.

3: Partial, the law makes only limited progress towards addressing the issue. The legal framework addresses the indicator, but insignificantly.

2: Partial, the law makes significant progress towards addressing the issue. The legal framework makes significant progress towards, but does not entirely meet the issue addressed in the indicator.

1: Yes, the law addresses the issue fully. The legal framework clearly or expressly meets the issue addressed in the indicator.

N/A: The indicator is not applicable. Not applicable is used in cases where the subject matter in question is non-existent.

Reference

Q7: Does the law require the consent of a community prior to its land being acquired by government or another actor?

4: No, the law does not address the issue. There are no attempts in the law to meet the issue addressed in the indicator.

3: Partial, the law makes only limited progress towards addressing the issue. The legal framework addresses the indicator, but insignificantly.

2: Partial, the law makes significant progress towards addressing the issue. The legal framework makes significant progress towards, but does not entirely meet the issue addressed in the indicator.

1: Yes, the law addresses the issue fully. The legal framework clearly or expressly meets the issue addressed in the indicator.

N/A: The indicator is not applicable. Not applicable is used in cases where the subject matter in question is non-existent.

Reference

Q8: Does the law recognize that rights to community land include ownership of all trees on the land?

4: No, the law does not address the issue. There are no attempts in the law to meet the issue addressed in the indicator.

3: Partial, the law makes only limited progress towards addressing the issue. The legal framework addresses the indicator, but insignificantly.

2: Partial, the law makes significant progress towards addressing the issue. The legal framework makes significant progress towards, but does not entirely meet the issue addressed in the indicator.

1: Yes, the law addresses the issue fully. The legal framework clearly or expressly meets the issue addressed in the indicator.

N/A: The indicator is not applicable. Not applicable is used in cases where the subject matter in question is non-existent.

Reference:

Q9: Does the law recognize that waters belong to the community within whose lands these are found?

4: No, the law does not address the issue. There are no attempts in the law to meet the issue addressed in the indicator.

3: Partial, the law makes only limited progress towards addressing the issue. The legal framework addresses the indicator, but insignificantly.

2: Partial, the law makes significant progress towards addressing the issue. The legal framework makes significant progress towards, but does not entirely meet the issue addressed in the indicator.

1: Yes, the law addresses the issue fully. The legal framework clearly or expressly meets the issue addressed in the indicator.

N/A: The indicator is not applicable. Not applicable is used in cases where the subject matter in question is non-existent.

Reference:

Q10: Does the law allow a community to own lands declared to be Protected Areas?

4: No, the law does not address the issue. There are no attempts in the law to meet the issue addressed in the indicator.

3: Partial, the law makes only limited progress towards addressing the issue. The legal framework addresses the indicator, but insignificantly.

2: Partial, the law makes significant progress towards addressing the issue. The legal framework makes significant progress towards, but does not entirely meet the issue addressed in the indicator.

1: Yes, the law addresses the issue fully. The legal framework clearly or expressly meets the issue addressed in the indicator.

N/A: The indicator is not applicable. Not applicable is used in cases where the subject matter in question is non-existent.

Reference:

Block 4: Indigenous Rights to the Land

Methodology for this block comes from the Indigenous Navigator, national-level questionnaires designed to assess the realisation of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). More information on this tool is available here.

This block derives the score for LANDex indicator 5A. If you wish to respond only to this block, please go directly to indicator 5A from this page.

Please read:

Please choose the response that best represents the situation in your country.

Under each response, you will be provided with a space to add references and detail to justify your response.

Q1: Has the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) been ratified?

Yes

Reference:

Q2: Has the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) been ratified?

Yes

Reference:

Q3: Has the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) been ratified?

Yes

Reference:

Q4: Has the Convention on Rights of the Child (CRC) been ratified?

Yes

Reference:

Q5: Has the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) been ratified?

Yes

Reference:

Q6: Has ILO Convention No. 107 been ratified?

Yes

Reference:

Q7: Has ILO Convention No. 169 been ratified?

Yes

Reference:

Q8: Has the American Convention on Human Rights been ratified?

Yes

N/A

Reference

Q9: Has the African Charter on Human and Peoples been ratified?

Yes

N/A

Reference

Q10: Have national action plans (strategies or other measures) been developed by States, in consultation and cooperation with indigenous peoples, to achieve the ends of the UNDRIP?

0: No, this issue is not addressed. There are no attempts to meet the issue addressed in the indicator.

1: Partial, only limited progress towards addressing the issue. The indicator is addressed, but insignificantly.

2: Partial, significant progress towards addressing the issue. There is significant progress towards the indicator, but it is not addressed entirely.

3: Yes, the issue is fully addressed. The indicator is clearly or expressly met.

Reference:

Q11: Do domestic law(s) prohibit advocacy of hatred constituting incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence against indigenous peoples?

2: Partial, significant progress towards addressing the issue. There is significant progress towards the indicator, but it is not addressed entirely.

0: No, this issue is not addressed. There are no attempts to meet the issue addressed in the indicator.

3: Yes, the issue is fully addressed. The indicator is clearly or expressly met.

1: Partial, only limited progress towards addressing the issue. The indicator is addressed, but insignificantly.

Reference

Q12: Are the collective rights of indigenous peoples to self-determination, i.e. to freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development, recognized in the constitution or other forms of superior law?

0: No, this issue is not addressed. There are no attempts to meet the issue addressed in the indicator.

1: Partial, only limited progress towards addressing the issue. The indicator is addressed, but insignificantly.

2: Partial, significant progress towards addressing the issue. There is significant progress towards the indicator, but it is not addressed entirely.

3: Yes, the issue is fully addressed. The indicator is clearly or expressly met.

Reference:

Q13: Is the recognition of indigenous peoples’ distinct identity in the constitution or national legislation based on self-identification?

Yes

Reference:

Q14: Is indigenous peoples’ right to self-government in internal and local affairs recognized in national legislation?

Yes

Reference:

Q15: Are indigenous peoples’ self-governing institutions and territories recognized in the political-administrative structure of the State?

Yes

Reference:

Q16: Is the jurisdiction of customary law institutions recognized in the constitution or other forms of superior law or domestic law(s)?

Yes

Reference:

Q17: Are indigenous peoples’ rights to lands, territories and resources recognized in national legislation?

Yes

Reference:

Q18: Are there clear procedures adopted by the State for identification, demarcation, mapping and registration of indigenous peoples’ lands or territories lands, in consultation with and in accordance with indigenous norms, values and customs?

0: No, this issue is not addressed. There are no attempts to meet the issue addressed in the indicator.

1: Partial, only limited progress towards addressing the issue. The indicator is addressed, but insignificantly.

2: Partial, significant progress towards addressing the issue. There is significant progress towards the indicator, but it is not addressed entirely.

3: Yes, the issue is fully addressed. The indicator is clearly or expressly met.

Reference:

Q19: Is indigenous peoples’ right to maintain cross-border contacts and collaboration recognized in national legislation?

Yes

Reference:

Q20: Is it a state duty to consult with indigenous peoples before adopting or implementing legislative or administrative measures that may affect them and prior to approval of any project that affects their lands, territories and resources in national legislation recognized?

Yes

Reference:

Q21: Do procedures or mechanisms for State consultation with indigenous peoples exist at national, sub-national and local levels?

1: Partial, only limited progress towards addressing the issue. The indicator is addressed, but insignificantly.

2: Partial, significant progress towards addressing the issue. There is significant progress towards the indicator, but it is not addressed entirely.

3: Yes, the issue is fully addressed. The indicator is clearly or expressly met.

0: No, this issue is not addressed. There are no attempts to meet the issue addressed in the indicator.

Reference:

Q22: Is the right of indigenous peoples to participate in decisions that may affect them, through their representative institutions, recognized in national legislation?

Yes

Reference:

Q23: Is right to access to translation into indigenous languages in legal proceedings recognized in the national legislation?

Yes

Reference: